Latin Neurosurgery
https://www.lneuro.org/article/doi/10.65571/3086-0725.e00112026
 Latin Neurosurgery
Original Article

Biological and morphometric factors associated with rupture of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a retrospective analysis of predictors and functional outcomes

Factores biológicos y morfométricos asociados a la rotura de aneurismas de la arteria cerebral media: análisis retrospectivo de predictores y resultados funcionales

Jose Luis Acha Luis Contreras Oscar Santos Victor Aldea Erick Ponce Barbara Chia

Downloads: 0
Views: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Microsurgical clipping remains the standard treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, although the relative significance of morphometric indices compared with biological factors in rupture prediction remains controversial. Objective: To identify independent predictors of rupture in MCA aneurysms and to evaluate functional outcomes following a microsurgical preservation-oriented protocol. Methods: A retrospective study of 96 patients was conducted at a tertiary referral center. Multivariable logistic regression analysis incorporated biologically plausible factors (age, hypertension, smoking) and variables with p < 0.20 in univariate analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curves. Functional status was evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) up to six months postoperatively. Results: Ruptured aneurysms accounted for 87.5% of cases. In multivariable analysis, age emerged as the only independent predictor of rupture (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.023). Dome diameter showed a nonsignificant trend toward rupture (6.80 mm vs. 5.80 mm; p = 0.072; AUC 0.64), outperforming aspect ratio (AUC 0.53). At six months, 90.1% of patients achieved functional independence (mRS 0-2). Conclusions: Age is the most robust predictor of rupture in MCA aneurysms, suggesting that rupture risk is closely linked to biological vascular degeneration rather than static geometric parameters.

Keywords

intracranial aneurysm; middle cerebral artery; microsurgery; treatment outcome; ruptured aneursym; fluorescein angiography.

Resumen

Introducción: El clipaje microquirúrgico sigue siendo el tratamiento estándar para los aneurismas de la arteria cerebral media (ACM), sin embargo, la importancia relativa de los índices morfométricos en comparación con los factores biológicos para la predicción de la rotura sigue siendo controvertida. Objetivo: Identificar predictores independientes de rotura en aneurismas de la ACM y evaluar los resultados funcionales tras un protocolo microquirúrgico orientado a la preservación. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de 96 pacientes en un centro de referencia terciario. El análisis de regresión logística multivariante incorporó factores biológicamente plausibles (edad, hipertensión, tabaquismo) y variables con p < 0,20 en el análisis univariante. El rendimiento diagnóstico se evaluó mediante curvas ROC. El estado funcional se evaluó mediante la Escala de Rankin modificada (mRS) hasta seis meses después de la cirugía. Resultados: Los aneurismas rotos representaron el 87,5% de los casos. En el análisis multivariante, la edad se identificó como el único predictor independiente de rotura (OR 1,05; IC del 95%: 1,01-1,09; p = 0,023). El diámetro del domo mostró una tendencia no significativa hacia la rotura (6,80 mm frente a 5,80 mm; p = 0,072; AUC 0,64), superando a la relación de aspecto (AUC 0,53). A los seis meses, el 90,1% de los pacientes alcanzó la independencia funcional (mRS 0-2). Conclusiones: La edad es el predictor más robusto de rotura en los aneurismas de la arteria cerebral media, lo que sugiere que el riesgo de rotura está estrechamente relacionado con la degeneración vascular biológica más que con parámetros geométricos estáticos.

Palabras clave

aneurisma intracraneal; arteria cerebral media; microcirugía; resultado del tratamiento; aneurisma roto; angiografía con fluoresceína.

References

1. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2368-400. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000070. PMid:26089327.

2. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5. PMid:16139655.

3. Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(1):59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1. PMid:24290159.

4. Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, et al. The natural course of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2474-82. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113260. PMid:22738097.

5. Roessler K, Krawagna M, Deinsberger W, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography in vascular neurosurgery: indications, clinical experiences, and limitations. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(2):377-87. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1948-2.

6. Szelényi A, Langer D, Kothbauer C, et al. Monitoring of motor-evoked potentials during surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(6):821-7.

7. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):103-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3. PMid:12867109.

8. Zhang X, Zhai J, He L, et al. Morphological and hemodynamic predictors of middle cerebral artery aneurysm rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2024;182:e110-22.

9. Thompson BG. Vascular aging and elastin degradation in MCA bifurcations. Stroke. 2023;54(4):1120-8.

10. Zhang X. Age-related changes in the biological and mechanical properties of the cerebral arterial wall. J Biomech. 2023;153:111589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111589.

11. Garcia L. Predictors of outcome in MCA aneurysm clipping. Acta Neurochir. 2023;165(5):1201-10.

12. Saito N. Morphometric analysis of MCA aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 2024;141(4):1020-30. 

13. Rodriguez M. Aspect ratio vs size in aneurysm rupture. Stroke. 2022;53(11):3340-8.

14. Lee K. Hemodynamics and morphology in MCA aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023;44(8):910-7.

15. Frösen J. Inflammation and the role of age in the formation and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(5):E4. 

16. Zhao J. ICG Videoangiography in aneurysm surgery: a 2024 update. Neurosurg Rev. 2024;47(1):15-25.

17. Nguyen V. Intraoperative monitoring in MCA bifurcation clipping. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023;148:102-10.

18. Patel A. Complication rates in modern microsurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2025;115:40-8.

19. Zhao J. Technical adjuncts for safety in MCA aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery. 2024;94(2):310-8.

20. Kim H. Impact of admission GCS on long-term functional status. Neurosurgery. 2025;96(1):88-95.

21. Al-Mufti F. Fisher Scale and delayed cerebral ischemia. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(3):250-60.

22. Tanaka A. Matrix metalloproteinase expression and elastin degradation in aged middle cerebral artery bifurcations. Stroke. 2024;55(2):410-8.


Submitted date:
05/19/2026

Reviewed date:
06/05/2026

Accepted date:
06/08/2026

Publication date:
06/19/2026

6a355a55a95395650425a678 lneuro Articles
Links & Downloads

Lat. Neurosurg.

Share this page
Page Sections